The more cars are software-defined and connected, the higher become the cybersecurity risks.
With every added feature, the risk of cyberattacks on vital components of a vehicle like user data and trust is worrisome. To mitigate these threats, a cybersecurity framework composed of laws and standards on an international and regional scale has been implemented which involves automotive manufacturers and suppliers as well as industry stakeholders.
Hence, this article may assist in an outline of the regulatory scope of both directly and indirectly related automotive cybersecurity regulations.
Across the world, several regulatory bodies worldwide are actively developing and implementing standards and frameworks to secure vehicles. The UNECE WP.29 (United Nations' World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations) stands out with its introduction of key regulations such as UN R155, focusing on Cybersecurity Management Systems (CSMS), and UN R156, addressing Software Update Management Systems (SUMS)... These regulations are mandatory for type approvals in countries adhering to UNECE regulations...
In addition to these global interventions, regional adaptations are also crucial to look at. In the U.S., the NHTSA's guidelines function as voluntary yet widely adopted best practices whereas NIST provides special publications and framework. The European Union has established a comprehensive framework of information security and cybersecurity regulatory directives, such as the NIS2 Directive and the Cyber Resilience Act (CRA), that are highly relevant to and directly impact the automotive industry. China, on the other hand, enforces a robust regulatory framework through a system of GB standards.
This varied landscape highlights the need for a global compliance strategy for any automotive company that operates globally.
The growth of regulations and standards associated with automotive cybersecurity is driven by several critical factors:
To provide a structured approach to managing cybersecurity risks, several international standards have been developed:
Europe presents a particularly complex regulatory landscape for automotive cybersecurity. The below are the regulations/standards that are directly or indirectly relevant to automotive cybersecurity.
The regulatory framework of Europe carries considerable weight for OEMs and suppliers, thus creating a baseline for compliance in the market. Therefore, it's worth highlighting ENISA which publishes traffic lights of information, best practice guides, and full regulatory recommendations concerning improving resilience to cyber capabilities across the EU.
To illustrate, the below image exhibits a draft connection between mentioned standards and regulations, in Europe.
China has established a robust legal framework for automotive cybersecurity, with the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) playing a central role. Key laws include the Cybersecurity Law, Data Security Law, and Personal Information Protection Law.
The Intelligent and Connected Vehicle (ICV) Industry Standard System outlines a comprehensive set of standards, including mandatory (GB) and recommended (GB/T) standards. Notably, GB 44495-2024 focuses on vehicle cybersecurity, aligning with UN R155, and GB 44496-2024 addresses software updates, similar to UN R156.
While both GB and UNECE require OEMs to establish CSMS and SUMS, GB standards establish their own technical requirements and test methods, and unlike UNECE, do not mention CSMS and SUMS certificates. Compliance with GB 44496-2024 defines clear requirements for implementing software update management systems, significantly affecting automotive operations in the Chinese market.
Other regions are also actively addressing automotive cybersecurity:
NIST (U.S.): Develops cybersecurity standards, guidelines, and best practices, with the NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) being widely adopted. Notable NIST standards are:
NHTSA (U.S.): Provides guidelines for automotive cybersecurity best practices. These guidelines are designed to help manufacturers protect vehicles from malicious attacks, unauthorized access, or damage to the vehicle's software systems.
JAMA-JAPIA (Japan): Establishes cybersecurity guidelines for Japan's automotive industry, often referencing international standards.
AIS-189 & AIS-190 (India): Outline CSMS and SUMS requirements for vehicular systems (draft, adopted from UN R155/R156) that will be released in 2027.
There is no doubt that the regulatory and standards landscape for automotive cybersecurity is complicated, especially in regions like Europe and China. This complexity makes it difficult for automotive manufacturers and suppliers to comply with national and international requirements. Regulatory requirements surrounding data privacy and information security, for example, are key considerations of automotive cybersecurity. There is a trend where existing regulations are changing, and new ones are being introduced at the regional level that impacts the automotive industry. It is important to note that suppliers are also responsible for putting CSMS processes in place and ensuring that their sub-components are compliant with cybersecurity requirements.